Learning Path
Navigate the AXO curriculum
Fundamentals
Implementation
AXO Scoring System
Quantitative 0-100 scoring methodology to measure and improve your content's agent-optimization level.
Scoring Breakdown (0-100 Points)
25
Structure
HTML hierarchy, headings, semantic markup
20
Clarity
Content quality, readability, specificity
20
Completeness
Information depth, context, examples
20
Trust
Authorship, dates, sources, credentials
15
Technical
Schema markup, metadata, performance
25Structure & Organization
Excellent (20-25 pts)
- • Perfect H1-H6 hierarchy
- • Semantic HTML throughout
- • Logical content flow
- • Clear section divisions
- • Consistent formatting
Good (10-19 pts)
- • Mostly proper headings
- • Some semantic elements
- • Generally logical flow
- • Minor structure issues
Needs Work (0-9 pts)
- • Poor heading hierarchy
- • Minimal semantic markup
- • Confusing organization
- • Inconsistent formatting
20Content Clarity & Quality
Excellent (16-20 pts)
- • Concise, direct language
- • Specific facts and data
- • Clear definitions
- • No marketing fluff
- • Easy to scan
Good (8-15 pts)
- • Generally clear writing
- • Some specific details
- • Mostly factual content
- • Minor clarity issues
Needs Work (0-7 pts)
- • Vague or unclear language
- • Lacks specific details
- • Heavy marketing language
- • Difficult to extract facts
20Information Completeness
Excellent (16-20 pts)
- • Comprehensive coverage
- • Relevant examples
- • Proper context provided
- • Addresses common questions
- • Links to related topics
Good (8-15 pts)
- • Covers main points
- • Some examples included
- • Basic context provided
- • Minor gaps in coverage
Needs Work (0-7 pts)
- • Incomplete information
- • Lacks examples
- • Missing context
- • Leaves questions unanswered
20Trust Signals & Authority
Excellent (16-20 pts)
- • Clear author credentials
- • Recent publication dates
- • Proper source citations
- • Contact information
- • Update timestamps
Good (8-15 pts)
- • Author name present
- • Publication date shown
- • Some source references
- • Basic contact info
Needs Work (0-7 pts)
- • No clear authorship
- • Missing or old dates
- • No source citations
- • Anonymous content
15Technical Implementation
Excellent (12-15 pts)
- • Complete JSON-LD schema
- • Valid HTML markup
- • Proper meta tags
- • Fast loading (<3s)
- • Mobile responsive
Good (6-11 pts)
- • Basic schema markup
- • Mostly valid HTML
- • Some meta tags
- • Acceptable performance
Needs Work (0-5 pts)
- • No structured data
- • Invalid HTML
- • Missing meta tags
- • Poor performance
Score Interpretation
85-100
Excellent
Highly optimized for agents. Ready for maximum discoverability.
70-84
Good
Well-optimized with minor improvements needed.
50-69
Fair
Moderate optimization. Several areas need attention.
0-49
Poor
Significant optimization needed across multiple areas.